All builds

Microfabrication · 2023

Homebrew photolithography for the rapid and low-cost,“Do It Yourself” prototyping of microfluidic devices

Photolithography is the foundational process at the root of micro-electromechanical (MEMS) and microfluidic systems manufacture. The process is descendant from the semiconductor industry, originating from printed circuit board and microprocessor fabrication, itself historically performed in a cleanroom environment utilizing expensive, specialist microfabrication equipment.

Performance the paper reports

0 of 5
  1. Motion—Motion accuracy: not reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability—Cell viability: not reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported

The full text was read and states no figure for any of the five.

How hard this is to adopt

3.8 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    5/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 4.4 µm.

  • Throughput

    2/2–5

    Operation appears single-unit or manually constrained.

  • Parts sourcing

    4/2–4

    Mostly off-the-shelf or kit-based components.

  • Skill needed

    4/2–4

    Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.

  • Facilities needed

    4/2–4

    Uses common benchtop/desktop equipment or generic consumables.

  • Documentation

    3/2–5

    Some open documentation or files are available.

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    4/1–4

    Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time — scored 5 (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no licence on the design files, link to the design files or which files exist (CAD, bill of materials, firmware…) for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Photolithography is the foundational process at the root of micro-electromechanical (MEMS) and microfluidic systems manufacture. The process is descendant from the semiconductor industry, originating from printed circuit board and microprocessor fabrication, itself historically performed in a cleanroom environment utilizing expensive, specialist microfabrication equipment. Consequently, these conditions prove cost-prohibitive and pose a large barrier to entry. We present a novel homebrew, "do-it-yourself" method for performing photolithography to produce master mold wafers using only household appliances and homemade equipment at the bench side, outside of a cleanroom, producing a range of designs including spiral, serpentine, rectangular, and circulatory. Our homebrew processes result in the production of microfluidic channels with feature resolution of ∼85 μm width and 50 μm height utilizing inkjet-printed photomasks on transparency film to expose dry-film photoresist. From start to finish, the entire process takes under <90 min and costs <£300. With SU8 epoxy negative photoresist and a chrome photomask, our low-cost UV exposure apparatus and homemade spincoater could be used to produce PDMS devices containing large arrays of identical microwells measuring 4.4 μm in diameter. We show that our homebrew method produces both rectangular and spiral microfluidic channels with better results than can be achieved by SLA 3D printing by comparison, and amenable to bonding into multilayer functional microfluidic devices. As these methods are fundamental to microfluidics manufacture, we envision that this work will be of value to researchers across a broad range of disciplines, such as those working in resource-constrained countries or conditions, with many and widely varying applications.

Bibliographic details

Published
2023-09-15
Journal/source
ACS Omega
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
DOI
10.1021/acsomega.3c05544
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
8 / 38
Pages
35393-35409
ISSN
2470-1343

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
18
References
18
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Daniel ToddNewcastle University
  2. Natalio KrasnogorCorresponding authorNewcastle University

Topics and keywords

Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesPhotolithographyCleanroomMicrofluidicsPhotoresistPhotomaskMicrofabricationNanotechnologyMaterials scienceConsumablesFabricationResistLayer (electronics)

Funding

  • Royal Academy of Engineering
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

No narrative note curated yet.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.