All builds

Bioreactors & Cell Culture · 2023

Enhanced Growth of Bacterial Cells in a Smart 3D Printed Bioreactor

In the last decade, there has been a notable advancement in diverse bioreactor types catering to various applications. However, conventional bioreactors often exhibit bulkiness and high costs, making them less accessible to many researchers and laboratory facilities.

Performance the paper reports

0 of 5
  1. Motion—Motion accuracy: not reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability—Cell viability: not reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported

The full text was read and states no figure for any of the five.

How hard this is to adopt

3.0 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    not scored

    N/A

  • Throughput

    2/2–5

    Operation appears single-unit or manually constrained.

  • Parts sourcing

    3/2–4

    Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.

  • Skill needed

    3/2–4

    Multiple technical skills appear required.

  • Facilities needed

    4/2–4

    Uses common benchtop/desktop equipment or generic consumables.

  • Documentation

    2/2–5

    provides partial build information but missing critical details required for reproduction

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    not scored

    No clear speed comparison found

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 2 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no cost, licence on the design files, link to the design files or which files exist (CAD, bill of materials, firmware…) for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

In the last decade, there has been a notable advancement in diverse bioreactor types catering to various applications. However, conventional bioreactors often exhibit bulkiness and high costs, making them less accessible to many researchers and laboratory facilities. In light of these challenges, this article aims to introduce and evaluate the development of a do-it-yourself (DIY) 3D printed smart bioreactor, offering a cost-effective and user-friendly solution for the proliferation of various bioentities, including bacteria and human organoids, among others. The customized bioreactor was fabricated under an ergonomic design and assembled with 3D printed mechanical parts combined with electronic components, under 3D printed housing. The 3D printed parts were designed using SOLIDWORKS® CAD Software (2022 SP2.0 Professional version) and fabricated via the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique. All parts were 3D printed with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) in order for the bioreactor to be used under sterile conditions. The printed low-cost bioreactor integrates Internet-of-things (IoT) functionalities, since it provides the operator with the ability to change its operational parameters (sampling frequency, rotor speed, and duty cycle) remotely, via a user-friendly developed mobile application and to save the user history locally on the device. Using this bioreactor, which is adjusted to a standard commercial 12-well plate, proof of concept of a successful operation of the bioreactor during a 2-day culture of Escherichia coli bacteria (Mach1 strain) is presented. This study paves the way for more in-depth investigation of bacterial and various biological-entity growth cultures, utilizing 3D printing technology to create customized low-cost bioreactors.

Bibliographic details

Published
2023-09-26
Journal/source
Micromachines
Publisher
MDPI AG
DOI
10.3390/mi14101829
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
14 / 10
Pages
1829
ISSN
2072-666X

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
9
References
26
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Eleftheria Maria PechlivaniCorresponding authorInformation Technologies Institute · Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
  2. Sotirios PemasInformation Technologies Institute · Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
  3. Alexandros KanlisInformation Technologies Institute · Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
  4. Paraskevi PechlivaniCentre for Research and Technology Hellas
  5. Spyros PetrakisCentre for Research and Technology Hellas
  6. Athanasios PapadimitriouInformation Technologies Institute · Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
  7. Dimitrios TzovarasInformation Technologies Institute · Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
  8. Konstantinos E. HatzistergosAristotle University of Thessaloniki

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesBioreactor3d printed3D printingComputer scienceProcess engineeringEngineeringManufacturing engineeringMechanical engineeringChemistry

Funding

  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme · No. 101037128
  • Centre for Research and Technology Hellas · No. 101037128
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

No narrative note curated yet.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.