All builds

Microfluidics · 2019

Modular microfluidic systems cast from 3D-printed molds for imaging leukocyte adherence to differentially treated endothelial cultures

Microfluidic systems are very useful for in vitro studies of interactions between blood cells and vascular endothelial cells under flow, and several commercial solutions exist. However, the availability of customizable, user-designed devices is largely restricted to researchers with expertise in photolithography and access to clean room facilities.

Performance the paper reports

0 of 5
  1. Motion—Motion accuracy: not reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability—Cell viability: not reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported

The full text was read and states no figure for any of the five.

How hard this is to adopt

2.4 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    2/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 250 µm.

  • Throughput

    2/2–5

    Operation appears single-unit or manually constrained.

  • Parts sourcing

    2/2–4

    Requires specialized or custom-built components.

  • Skill needed

    2/2–4

    Multiple advanced technical skills appear required.

  • Facilities needed

    2/2–4

    Requires specialized facilities, equipment, or consumables.

  • Documentation

    3/2–5

    Some open documentation or files are available.

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    not scored

    No clear speed comparison found

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no cost, licence on the design files or link to the design files for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Microfluidic systems are very useful for in vitro studies of interactions between blood cells and vascular endothelial cells under flow, and several commercial solutions exist. However, the availability of customizable, user-designed devices is largely restricted to researchers with expertise in photolithography and access to clean room facilities. Here we describe a strategy for producing tailor-made modular microfluidic systems, cast in PDMS from 3D-printed molds, to facilitate studies of leukocyte adherence to endothelial cells. A dual-chamber barrier module was optimized for culturing two endothelial cell populations, separated by a 250 μm wide dividing wall, on a glass slide. In proof-of-principle experiments one endothelial population was activated by TNFα, while the other served as an internal control. The barrier module was thereafter replaced with a microfluidic flow module, enclosing both endothelial populations in a common channel. A suspension of fluorescently-labeled leukocytes was then perfused through the flow module and leukocyte interactions with control and TNFα-treated endothelial populations were monitored in the same field of view. Time-lapse microscopy analysis confirmed the preferential attachment of leukocytes to the TNFα-activated endothelial cells. We conclude that the functionality of these modular microfluidic systems makes it possible to seed and differentially activate adherent cell types, and conduct controlled side-by-side analysis of their capacity to interact with cells in suspension under flow. Furthermore, we outline a number of practical considerations and solutions associated with connecting and switching between the microfluidic modules, and the advantages of simultaneously and symmetrically analyzing control and experimental conditions in such a microfluidic system.

Bibliographic details

Published
2019-08-05
Journal/source
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
DOI
10.1038/s41598-019-47475-z
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
9 / 1
Pages
Not supplied
ISSN
2045-2322

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
24
References
31
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Rodrigo Hernández VeraUppsala University
  2. P.W. O’CallaghanUppsala University
  3. Nikos Fatsis-KavalopoulosUppsala University · Gradientech (Sweden)
  4. Johan KreugerCorresponding authorUppsala University

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesMicrofluidicsModular designEndothelial stem cellCell biologySuspension cultureBiomedical engineeringIn vitroNanotechnologyMaterials scienceComputer scienceCell cultureBiology
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

No narrative note curated yet.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.