Implementation of 3D Printing Technology in the Field of Prosthetics: Past, Present, and Future
Supplemental record retained to make the downloaded paper corpus fully navigable.
- Year
- —
- Skill
- medium
- Docs
- moderate
- Rubric
- N/A
Implementation assessment
Scoring by criterion
Scores describe accessibility and implementation characteristics reported in the reviewed source. They are not a measure of scientific quality.
Resolution
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Scalability/Throughput
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Build and Part Sourcing Complexity
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Skill Complexity
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Equipment/Cosumable/Facility Requirement Accessibility
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Application Level
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Accessibility to documentation
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Validation/Troubleshooting Complexity
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Speed/Cycle Time
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Build Time
N/APaper is outside the rubric's bioprinting/liquid-handling/microfabrication types.
Record metadata
Publication data
Crossref and OpenAlex
Publication record
Abstract
There is an interesting and long history of prostheses designed for those with upper-limb difference, and yet issues still persist that have not yet been solved. Prosthesis needs for children are particularly complex, due in part to their growth rates. Access to a device can have a significant impact on a child's psychosocial development. Often, devices supporting both cosmetic form and user function are not accessible to children due to high costs, insurance policies, medical availability, and their perceived durability and complexity of control. These challenges have encouraged a grassroots effort globally to offer a viable solution for the millions of people living with limb difference around the world. The innovative application of 3D printing for customizable and user-specific hardware has led to open-source Do It Yourself "DIY" production of assistive devices, having an incredible impact globally for families with little recourse. This paper examines new research and development of prostheses by the maker community and nonprofit organizations, as well as a novel case study exploring the development of technology and the training methods available. These design efforts are discussed further in the context of the medical regulatory framework in the United States and highlight new associated clinical studies designed to measure the quality of life impact of such devices.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
Supplemental record retained to make the downloaded paper corpus fully navigable.
Limitations
Metadata is limited to the download manifest and title-derived mapping.