MicrofabricationCurated metadata

Low-cost, versatile, and highly reproducible microfabrication pipeline to generate 3D-printed customised cell culture devices with complex designs

Record generated from the current DIY biofabrication corpus.

medium skilllimited docsCrossrefOpenAlex
Publication data

Crossref and OpenAlex

Publication record

Matched by title · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Cell culture devices, such as microwells and microfluidic chips, are designed to increase the complexity of cell-based models while retaining control over culture conditions and have become indispensable platforms for biological systems modelling. From microtopography, microwells, plating devices, and microfluidic systems to larger constructs such as live imaging chamber slides, a wide variety of culture devices with different geometries have become indispensable in biology laboratories. However, while their application in biological projects is increasing exponentially, due to a combination of the techniques, equipment and tools required for their manufacture, and the expertise necessary, biological and biomedical labs tend more often to rely on already made devices. Indeed, commercially developed devices are available for a variety of applications but are often costly and, importantly, lack the potential for customisation by each individual lab. The last point is quite crucial, as often experiments in wet labs are adapted to whichever design is already available rather than designing and fabricating custom systems that perfectly fit the biological question. This combination of factors still restricts widespread application of microfabricated custom devices in most biological wet labs. Capitalising on recent advances in bioengineering and microfabrication aimed at solving these issues, and taking advantage of low-cost, high-resolution desktop resin 3D printers combined with PDMS soft lithography, we have developed an optimised a low-cost and highly reproducible microfabrication pipeline. This is thought specifically for biomedical and biological wet labs with not prior experience in the field, which will enable them to generate a wide variety of customisable devices for cell culture and tissue engineering in an easy, fast reproducible way for a fraction of the cost of conventional microfabrication or commercial alternatives. This protocol is designed specifically to be a resource for biological labs with limited expertise in those techniques and enables the manufacture of complex devices across the μm to cm scale. We provide a ready-to-go pipeline for the efficient treatment of resin-based 3D-printed constructs for PDMS curing, using a combination of polymerisation steps, washes, and surface treatments. Together with the extensive characterisation of the fabrication pipeline, we show the utilisation of this system to a variety of applications and use cases relevant to biological experiments, ranging from micro topographies for cell alignments to complex multipart hydrogel culturing systems. This methodology can be easily adopted by any wet lab, irrespective of prior expertise or resource availability and will enable the wide adoption of tailored microfabricated devices across many fields of biology.

Bibliographic details

Published
2024-03-13
Journal/source
PLOS Biology
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002503
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
22 / 3
Pages
e3002503
ISSN
1545-7885

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
14
References
73
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Cathleen HagemannCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  2. M. BaileyCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute
  3. Eugenia CarraroCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  4. Ksenia S. StankevichCorresponding authorUniversity of York
  5. Valentina M. LionelloCorresponding authorThe Francis Crick Institute · University College London
  6. Noreen KhokharCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · University College London
  7. Pacharaporn SuklaiCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  8. Carmen Moreno-GonzalezCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  9. Kelly O’TooleCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  10. George KonstantinouCorresponding authorThe Francis Crick Institute
  11. Christina L. DixCorresponding authorThe Francis Crick Institute
  12. Sudeep JoshiCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute
  13. Eleonora GiagnorioCorresponding authorThe Francis Crick Institute · Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · University College London
  14. Mads S. BergholtCorresponding authorKing's College London
  15. Christopher D. SpicerCorresponding authorUniversity of York
  16. Albane ImbertCorresponding authorThe Francis Crick Institute
  17. Francesco Saverio TedescoCorresponding authorGreat Ormond Street Hospital · The Francis Crick Institute · University College London
  18. Andrea SerioCorresponding authorKing's College London · The Francis Crick Institute · UK Dementia Research Institute

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesMicrofabricationMicrofluidicsNanotechnology3d printedComputer science3D printing3D cell culturePipeline (software)Biochemical engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineering

Funding

  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · BB/T014318/1
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · BB/W006561/1
  • Dementia Research Institute
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council · 10080927, 10079726, 10082354 and 10078461
  • European Research Council · 759108
  • AFM-Téléthon · 21687
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · BB/M009513/1
  • CureCMD · 576031
  • Muscular Dystrophy UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Francis Crick Institute
  • Leverhulme Trust · RPG-2022-174
  • Wellcome Trust · 225257/Z/22/Z