All builds

Bioprinting · Extrusion · 2025 · Science Advances

3D bioprinting of collagen-based high-resolution internally perfusable scaffolds for engineering fully biologic tissue systems

Organ-on-a-chip and microfluidic systems have improved the translational relevance of in vitro systems; however, current manufacturing approaches impart limitations on materials selection, non-native mechanical properties, geometric complexity, and cell-driven remodeling into functional tissues. Here, we three-dimensionally (3D) bioprint extracellular matrix (ECM) and cells into collagen-based high-resolution internally perfusable scaffolds (CHIPS) that integrate with a vascular and perfusion organ-on-a-chip reactor (VAPOR) to form a complete tissue engineering platform.

Performance the paper reports

1 of 5
  1. Motion100 mmMotion accuracy: reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability—Cell viability: not reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported
  • Motion / positional accuracy100 mm
    Single- material printing used a custom gantry 3D printer configuration driven by four Parker Hannifin 404 × R 100 mm travel precision stages (8- µm travel accuracy) as previously described (64).

How hard this is to adopt

3.3 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    3/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 100 µm.

  • Throughput

    3/2–5

    Moderate scalability via modularity, batching, or partial automation.

  • Parts sourcing

    3/2–4

    Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.

  • Skill needed

    2/2–4

    Multiple advanced technical skills appear required.

  • Facilities needed

    3/2–4

    Requires accessible but nontrivial lab/maker equipment.

  • Documentation

    4/2–5

    Open resources include several build or operation artifacts.

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    4/1–4

    Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no cost or which files exist (CAD, bill of materials, firmware…) for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Organ-on-a-chip and microfluidic systems have improved the translational relevance of in vitro systems; however, current manufacturing approaches impart limitations on materials selection, non-native mechanical properties, geometric complexity, and cell-driven remodeling into functional tissues. Here, we three-dimensionally (3D) bioprint extracellular matrix (ECM) and cells into collagen-based high-resolution internally perfusable scaffolds (CHIPS) that integrate with a vascular and perfusion organ-on-a-chip reactor (VAPOR) to form a complete tissue engineering platform. We improve the fidelity of freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) bioprinting to produce a range of CHIPS designs fabricated in a one-step process. CHIPS exhibit size-dependent permeability of perfused molecules into the surrounding scaffold to support cell viability and migration. Lastly, we implemented multi-material bioprinting to control 3D spatial patterning, ECM composition, cellularization, and material properties to create a glucose-responsive, insulin-secreting pancreatic-like CHIPS with vascular endothelial cadherin + vascular-like networks. Together, CHIPS and VAPOR form a platform technology toward engineering full organ-scale function for disease modeling and cell replacement therapy.

Bibliographic details

Published
2025-04-23
Journal/source
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.adu5905
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
11 / 17
Pages
Not supplied
ISSN
2375-2548

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
84
References
72
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Daniel J. ShiwarskiCorresponding authorUniversity of Pittsburgh · Carnegie Mellon University
  2. Andrew R. HudsonCorresponding authorCarnegie Mellon University
  3. Joshua W. TashmanCarnegie Mellon University
  4. Ezgi BakırcıCarnegie Mellon University
  5. Samuel MossCarnegie Mellon University
  6. Brian CoffinUniversity of Pittsburgh · Carnegie Mellon University
  7. Adam W. FeinbergCorresponding authorCarnegie Mellon University

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchTissue engineeringScaffoldExtracellular matrix3D bioprintingBiomedical engineeringBiofabricationSelf-healing hydrogelsOrgan-on-a-chipMaterials scienceNanotechnologyMicrofluidicsChemistry
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

Likely the key Replistruder-associated publication; we should extract the repo link from full text.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.