Designing Cost-Effective, Open-Source, Multi-Head Bioprinters via Conversion of Hobby-Grade 3D Printers
Practical recipe for labs; in-scope as an open tool/system even if preprint.
- Year
- 2022
- Skill
- medium
- Docs
- limited
- Rubric
- 3.3 / 5
Implementation assessment
Scoring by criterion
Scores describe accessibility and implementation characteristics reported in the reviewed source. They are not a measure of scientific quality.
Resolution
No clear feature-size or precision evidence found.
Scalability/Throughput
Evidence of parallel, plate-scale, multi-head, or unattended operation.
Build and Part Sourcing Complexity
Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.
Skill Complexity
Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.
Equipment/Cosumable/Facility Requirement Accessibility
Requires specialized facilities, equipment, or consumables.
Application Level
Presented as modular or usable across multiple workflows.
Accessibility to documentation
Some open documentation or files are available.
Validation/Troubleshooting Complexity
Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.
Speed/Cycle Time
Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.
Build Time
Build time not reported; assigned neutral score.
Record metadata
Publication data
Crossref and OpenAlex
Publication record
Abstract
Abstract Over the past decade, additive manufacturing has resulted in significant advances towards fabricating anatomic-size, patient-specific scaffolds for tissue models and regenerative medicine. This can be attributed to the development of advanced bioinks capable of precise deposition of cells and biomaterials. The combination of additive manufacturing with advanced bioinks is enabling researchers to fabricate intricate tissue scaffolds that recreate the complex spatial distributions of cells and bioactive cues found in the human body. However, the expansion of this promising technique has been hampered by the high cost of commercially available bioprinters and proprietary software. In contrast, conventional 3D printing has become increasingly popular with home hobbyists and caused an explosion of both low-cost thermoplastic 3D printers and open source software to control the printer. In this work, we bring these benefits into the field of bioprinting by converting widely available and cost-effective 3D printers into fully functional, open source, and customizable multi-head bioprinters. We demonstrate the practicality of this approach by designing bioprinters customized with multiple extruders, automatic bed leveling, and temperature controls for approximately $400. These bioprinters were then used for in vitro and ex vivo bioprinting to demonstrate their utility for tissue engineering.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
Practical recipe for labs; in-scope as an open tool/system even if preprint.
Limitations
No limitation note curated yet.