BioprintingExtrusionCurated metadata

Designing Cost-Effective, Open-Source, Multi-Head Bioprinters via Conversion of Hobby-Grade 3D Printers

Practical recipe for labs; in-scope as an open tool/system even if preprint.

Open-sourcemedium skilllimited docsCrossrefOpenAlex
Publication data

Crossref and OpenAlex

Publication record

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, additive manufacturing has resulted in significant advances towards fabricating anatomic-size, patient-specific scaffolds for tissue models and regenerative medicine. This can be attributed to the development of advanced bioinks capable of precise deposition of cells and biomaterials. The combination of additive manufacturing with advanced bioinks is enabling researchers to fabricate intricate tissue scaffolds that recreate the complex spatial distributions of cells and bioactive cues found in the human body. However, the expansion of this promising technique has been hampered by the high cost of commercially available bioprinters and proprietary software. In contrast, conventional 3D printing has become increasingly popular with home hobbyists and caused an explosion of both low-cost thermoplastic 3D printers and open source software to control the printer. In this work, we bring these benefits into the field of bioprinting by converting widely available and cost-effective 3D printers into fully functional, open source, and customizable multi-head bioprinters. We demonstrate the practicality of this approach by designing bioprinters customized with multiple extruders, automatic bed leveling, and temperature controls for approximately $400. These bioprinters were then used for in vitro and ex vivo bioprinting to demonstrate their utility for tissue engineering.

Bibliographic details

Published
2022-03-27
Journal/source
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
DOI
10.1101/2022.03.24.483055
Type
posted-content
Language
en
Volume / issue
Not supplied
Pages
Not supplied
ISSN
Not supplied

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
green
License
Not supplied
Version
acceptedVersion
Cited by
1
References
15
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. David ChimeneCorresponding authorTexas A&M University
  2. Kaivalya A. DeoTexas A&M University
  3. Jeremy ThomasTexas A&M University
  4. Akhilesh K. GaharwarCorresponding authorTexas A&M University

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation3D printingComputer scienceFused deposition modeling3D bioprintingOpen source3d printedSoftwareTissue engineeringHobby3d printerRegenerative medicineBiomedical engineering