Development of a high-performance open-source 3D bioprinter
Canonical ‘Feinberg lab’ open-source bioprinter paper; directly in-scope for new open tools.
- Year
- 2022
- Skill
- medium
- Docs
- moderate
- Rubric
- 3.4 / 5
Implementation assessment
Scoring by criterion
Scores describe accessibility and implementation characteristics reported in the reviewed source. They are not a measure of scientific quality.
Resolution
Quantitative handling accuracy reported, but minimum volume unclear.
Scalability/Throughput
Throughput not explicit; assigned moderate default.
Build and Part Sourcing Complexity
Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.
Skill Complexity
Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.
Equipment/Cosumable/Facility Requirement Accessibility
Uses common benchtop/desktop equipment or generic consumables.
Application Level
Application scope appears narrow or proof-of-concept.
Accessibility to documentation
Open resources include several build or operation artifacts.
Validation/Troubleshooting Complexity
Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.
Speed/Cycle Time
Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.
Build Time
Build time not reported; assigned neutral score.
Record metadata
Publication data
Crossref and OpenAlex
Publication record
Abstract
The application of 3D printing to biological research has provided the tissue engineering community with a method for organizing cells and biological materials into complex 3D structures. While many commercial bioprinting platforms exist, they are expensive, ranging from $5000 to over $1,000,000. This high cost of entry prevents many labs from incorporating 3D bioprinting into their research. Due to the open-source nature of desktop plastic 3D printers, an alternative option has been to convert low-cost plastic printers into bioprinters. Several open-source modifications have been described, but there remains a need for a user-friendly, step-by-step guide for converting a thermoplastic printer into a bioprinter using components with validated performance. Here we convert a low-cost 3D printer, the FlashForge Finder, into a bioprinter using our Replistruder 4 syringe pump and the Duet3D Duet 2 WiFi for total cost of less than $900. We demonstrate that the accuracy of the bioprinter's travel is better than 35 µm in all three axes and quantify fidelity by printing square lattice collagen scaffolds with average errors less than 2%. We also show high fidelity reproduction of clinical-imaging data by printing a scaffold of a human ear using collagen bioink. Finally, to maximize accessibility and customizability, all components we have designed for the bioprinter conversion are provided as open-source 3D models, along with instructions for further modifying the bioprinter for additional use cases, resulting in a comprehensive guide for the bioprinting field.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Funding
- National Institutes of Health · F30HL154728
- National Institutes of Health · K99HL155777
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration · R01FD006582
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
Canonical ‘Feinberg lab’ open-source bioprinter paper; directly in-scope for new open tools.
Limitations
no cell viability or functional validation, how reproducible is the building (e.g. build time, failure rate, user variability)