Liquid HandlingBioprintingExtrusionCurated metadata

Nydus One Syringe Extruder (NOSE): A Prusa i3 3D printer modification for laboratory automation and syringe-based extrusion

Often referenced for syringe-based extrusion designs; adjacent to extrusion bioprinting toolchains.

Open-sourcemedium skillmoderate docsCrossrefOpenAlex
Publication data

Crossref and OpenAlex

Publication record

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Bioprinting, combined with other tissue engineering techniques, is a promising method to create engineered tissues or standardized 3D cell culturing models. It has potential applications in the development of animal free models for drug toxicity screenings or for personalized medicine approaches. Here we report the conversion of the worldwide used open source 3D printer (RepRap, Prusa i3) to a functional and affordable bioprinter by substituting the common plastic-extruder with the Nydus One Syringe Extruder (NOSE). The NOSE modification enables mechanical hydrogel extrusion as well as a tunable deposition precision and volume by featuring a modular syringe-holder concept. A cost effective and simple hardware design including a custom software (termed ‘composer’) was developed to prove that this technique can be made accessible for a broader public. Furthermore, the printing procedure was optimized for the peer-reviewed FRESH-method by Hinton et al. which allows to print geometrical complex cell-laden constructs. We provide a detailed protocol on the creation of the FRESH-gel to ensure the reproducibility of this state of the art method. As a proof of concept HEK293 cells as well as mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) were utilized for cell-laden printing. Depending on the cellular source the survival rates range from 60% up to 95%. Automatized quantitative viability analysis was performed using the open source image analysis tool Icy, in particular the “spot detector” plugin. A detailed protocol allows the recreation of the assay. Further data utilizing a support bath printing technique reveal limitations regarding the printing and residential time of cell-laden constructs. Keywords: Open Source Bioprinter, RepRap Modificiation, Mechanical Syringe Extruder, Bioprinting Protocol, Bioprinting Software

Bibliographic details

Published
2019-06-11
Journal/source
HardwareX
Publisher
Elsevier BV
DOI
10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00069
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
6
Pages
e00069
ISSN
2468-0672

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
67
References
19
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Nils BesslerCorresponding authorRuhr University Bochum
  2. Dennis OgiermannRuhr University Bochum
  3. Maj‐Britt BuchholzUniversity Medical Center Utrecht
  4. Alexander SantelRuhr University Bochum
  5. J. HeidenreichRuhr University Bochum
  6. Rawas AhmmedRuhr University Bochum
  7. Holm ZaehresRuhr University Bochum
  8. Beate Brand-SaberiCorresponding authorRuhr University Bochum

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchModular designSyringeComputer scienceProtocol (science)3D printing3d printerBiomedical engineeringEmbedded systemComputer hardwareNanotechnologyMaterials scienceEngineering

Funding

  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum