Design and implementation of a low cost bio-printer modification, allowing for switching between plastic and gel extrusion
Record generated from the current DIY biofabrication corpus.
- Year
- —
- Skill
- medium
- Docs
- limited
- Rubric
- 3.2 / 5
Implementation assessment
Scoring by criterion
Scores describe accessibility and implementation characteristics reported in the reviewed source. They are not a measure of scientific quality.
Resolution
No clear feature-size or precision evidence found.
Scalability/Throughput
Moderate scalability via modularity, batching, or partial automation.
Build and Part Sourcing Complexity
Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.
Skill Complexity
Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.
Equipment/Cosumable/Facility Requirement Accessibility
Requires specialized facilities, equipment, or consumables.
Application Level
Supports broad or translationally relevant applications.
Accessibility to documentation
Some open documentation or files are available.
Validation/Troubleshooting Complexity
Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.
Speed/Cycle Time
No clear speed comparison found; assigned neutral score.
Build Time
Build time not reported; assigned neutral score.
Record metadata
Publication data
Crossref and OpenAlex
Publication record
Abstract
Due to the high cost of bioprinters they are not feasible for proof of concept experiments or educational purposes. Furthermore, the more affordable DIY methods all disable the plastic printing capability of the original printer. Here we present an affordable bio-printing modification that is easy to install and maintains the original capabilities of the printer. The modification used mostly 3D printed parts and is based on the popular, open-source Prusa i3 3D printer. The modifications are kept as simple as possible and uses standard slicing software, allowing for installation by less experienced builders. By using disposable syringes and easily sterilizable parts, an aseptic bioprinting setup can be achieved, depending on the environment. It also allows for 2 component printing as well as UV curing. The bio-printing and curing capabilities were shown by printing and curing an artificial biofilm of an electro-active bacteria, Geobacter sulfurreducens, onto a carbon-cloth electrode which was used in a microbial fuel cell.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Funding
- Vetenskapsradet · 2018 - 03875
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
No narrative note curated yet.
Limitations
No limitation note curated yet.