Automated Liquid Handler from a 3D Printer
Supplemental record retained to make the downloaded paper corpus fully navigable.
- Year
- —
- Skill
- medium
- Docs
- moderate
- Rubric
- 3.5 / 5
Implementation assessment
Scoring by criterion
Scores describe accessibility and implementation characteristics reported in the reviewed source. They are not a measure of scientific quality.
Resolution
Minimum volume evidence about 100 uL.
Scalability/Throughput
Evidence of parallel, plate-scale, multi-head, or unattended operation.
Build and Part Sourcing Complexity
Part sourcing complexity not explicit; assigned moderate default.
Skill Complexity
Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.
Equipment/Cosumable/Facility Requirement Accessibility
Requires accessible but nontrivial lab/maker equipment.
Application Level
Presented as modular or usable across multiple workflows.
Accessibility to documentation
Open resources include several build or operation artifacts.
Validation/Troubleshooting Complexity
Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.
Speed/Cycle Time
Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.
Build Time
Build time not reported; assigned neutral score.
Record metadata
Publication data
Crossref and OpenAlex
Publication record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Efforts to encourage laboratory automation through student access to and usage of commercial equipment are hampered by prohibitive acquisition costs. Here, an automated liquid handler using manual pipettes was developed to operate on a commercial hobbyist 3D printer at a cost of US $325. Arising from an iterative design process that ensured sufficient strength and rigidity, the adapter assembly, when fabricated by using 3D printing, was found to operate as it was intended. Tests conducted found the system to be sufficiently stable and accurate in its positioning, while pipetting accuracy was not affected. A survey following a usage exercise with the operational system was conducted as part of an overall effort to encourage students to overcome their disciplinary boundaries.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
Supplemental record retained to make the downloaded paper corpus fully navigable.
Limitations
Metadata is limited to the download manifest and title-derived mapping.