All builds

Bioprinting · Extrusion · FRESH · 2021 · Scientific Reports

An open source extrusion bioprinter based on the E3D motion system and tool changer to enable FRESH and multimaterial bioprinting

Bioprinting is increasingly used to create complex tissue constructs for an array of research applications, and there are also increasing efforts to print tissues for transplantation. Bioprinting may also prove valuable in the context of drug screening for personalized medicine for treatment of diseases such as cancer.

Performance the paper reports

1 of 5
  1. Motion—Motion accuracy: not reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability90%Cell viability: reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported
  • Cell viability90%
    We found viability to be similar between overnight (~ 20 h) and 1 week cultures, which was on average 90% (Fig. 3g).

How hard this is to adopt

3.1 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    3/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 100 µm.

  • Throughput

    4/2–5

    Evidence of parallel, plate-scale, multi-head, or unattended operation.

  • Parts sourcing

    3/2–4

    Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.

  • Skill needed

    3/2–4

    Multiple technical skills appear required.

  • Facilities needed

    3/2–4

    Requires accessible but nontrivial lab/maker equipment.

  • Documentation

    2/2–5

    provides partial build information but missing critical details required for reproduction

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    not scored

    N/A

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no cost, licence on the design files or link to the design files for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by title · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Bioprinting is increasingly used to create complex tissue constructs for an array of research applications, and there are also increasing efforts to print tissues for transplantation. Bioprinting may also prove valuable in the context of drug screening for personalized medicine for treatment of diseases such as cancer. However, the rapidly expanding bioprinting research field is currently limited by access to bioprinters. To increase the availability of bioprinting technologies we present here an open source extrusion bioprinter based on the E3D motion system and tool changer to enable high-resolution multimaterial bioprinting. As proof of concept, the bioprinter is used to create collagen constructs using freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) methodology, as well as multimaterial constructs composed of distinct sections of laminin and collagen. Data is presented demonstrating that the bioprinted constructs support growth of cells either seeded onto printed constructs or included in the bioink prior to bioprinting. This open source bioprinter is easily adapted for different bioprinting applications, and additional tools can be incorporated to increase the capabilities of the system.

Bibliographic details

Published
2021-11-03
Journal/source
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-00931-1
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
11 / 1
Pages
Not supplied
ISSN
2045-2322

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
32
References
36
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Adam EngbergUppsala University
  2. Christina StelzlUppsala University
  3. Olle ErikssonUppsala University
  4. P.W. O’CallaghanUppsala University
  5. Johan KreugerCorresponding authorUppsala University

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies3D bioprintingBiofabricationContext (archaeology)Computer scienceSelf-healing hydrogelsTissue engineeringNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineering

Funding

  • Uppsala University
  • VINNOVA · 2019-00029
  • Cancerfonden · 20 1285 PjF 01 H
  • Uppsala University
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

Open-source multimaterial/FRESH-enabling design; very aligned with ‘Replistruder-like’ tooling.

Limitations

no commercial benchmarking