All builds

Bioprinting · Extrusion · 2020 · JoVE

Design of an Open-Source, Low-Cost Bioink and Food Melt Extrusion 3D Printer

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an increasingly popular manufacturing technique that allows highly complex objects to be fabricated with no retooling costs. This increasing popularity is partly driven by falling barriers to entry such as system set-up costs and ease of operation.

Performance the paper reports

full text not held
  1. Motionn/aMotion accuracy: not assessed
  2. Volumen/aVolumetric accuracy: not assessed
  3. Viabilityn/aCell viability: not assessed
  4. Unattendedn/aUnattended operation: not assessed
  5. Standardn/aStandard compliance: not assessed

How hard this is to adopt

3.3 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    1/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 1000 µm.

  • Throughput

    2/2–5

    Operation appears single-unit or manually constrained.

  • Parts sourcing

    3/2–4

    Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.

  • Skill needed

    4/2–4

    Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.

  • Facilities needed

    4/2–4

    Uses common benchtop/desktop equipment or generic consumables.

  • Documentation

    4/2–5

    Open resources include several build or operation artifacts.

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    4/1–4

    Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no licence on the design files or link to the design files for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an increasingly popular manufacturing technique that allows highly complex objects to be fabricated with no retooling costs. This increasing popularity is partly driven by falling barriers to entry such as system set-up costs and ease of operation. Full abstract at the publisher

Bibliographic details

Published
2020-03-02
Journal/source
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Publisher
MyJove Corporation
DOI
10.3791/59834
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
157
Pages
Not supplied
ISSN
1940-087X

Access and metrics

Open access
No
OA status
closed
License
Not supplied
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
6
References
9
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Matthew LanaroQueensland University of Technology
  2. Jacob SkewesQueensland University of Technology
  3. Logan SpiersQueensland University of Technology
  4. Prasad YarlagaddaQueensland University of Technology
  5. Maria A. WoodruffQueensland University of Technology

Topics and keywords

Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies3D Printing in Biomedical Research3D printingExtrusionFabricationComputer science3d printedSoftwareProtocol (science)Rapid prototypingFraming (construction)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineering drawing
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

Concrete reproducible build/protocol paper; directly aligned with ‘new open tools’ ask.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.