All builds

Bioprinting · DLP · Vat photopolymerization · 2025 · Inventions (MDPI)

An Open-Source 3D Bioprinter Using Direct Light Processing for Tissue Engineering Applications

The demand for organ transplantation continues to rise worldwide, intensifying the gap between supply and demand and driving research in tissue engineering (TE). Bioprinting, particularly light-based vat photopolymerization (VP) methods such as digital light processing (DLP), has emerged as a promising strategy to fabricate complex, cell-compatible tissue constructs with high precision.

Performance the paper reports

0 of 5
  1. Motion—Motion accuracy: not reported
  2. Volume—Volumetric accuracy: not reported
  3. Viability—Cell viability: not reported
  4. Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
  5. Standard—Standard compliance: not reported

The full text was read and states no figure for any of the five.

How hard this is to adopt

3.3 of 5, higher is easier

Each score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.

  • Resolution

    4/1–5

    Smallest feature/positioning evidence about 10.8 µm.

  • Throughput

    4/2–5

    Evidence of parallel, plate-scale, multi-head, or unattended operation.

  • Parts sourcing

    3/2–4

    Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.

  • Skill needed

    2/2–4

    Multiple advanced technical skills appear required.

  • Facilities needed

    2/2–4

    Requires specialized facilities, equipment, or consumables.

  • Documentation

    3/2–5

    Some open documentation or files are available.

  • Validation effort

    4/2–4

    Validation includes standards, benchmarking, replicates, or multi-condition tests.

  • Cycle time

    4/1–4

    Speed evidence suggests rapid, real-time, or automated operation.

2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
  • Application Level — scored 4 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
  • Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.

Both remain in the published dataset.

Have you built this?

Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.

Report a rebuild

Know what this record is missing?

The index has no licence on the design files or which files exist (CAD, bill of materials, firmware…) for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.

Fill the gap
Record metadata
Publication data

Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21

Abstract

The demand for organ transplantation continues to rise worldwide, intensifying the gap between supply and demand and driving research in tissue engineering (TE). Bioprinting, particularly light-based vat photopolymerization (VP) methods such as digital light processing (DLP), has emerged as a promising strategy to fabricate complex, cell-compatible tissue constructs with high precision. In this study, we developed an open-source, bottom-up DLP bioprinter designed to provide a cost-effective and modular alternative to commercial systems. The device was built from commercially available components and custom-fabricated parts, with tolerance allocation and deviation analyses applied to ensure structural reliability. Mechanical and optical subsystems were modeled and validated, and the control architecture was implemented on the Arduino platform with a custom Python-based graphical interface. The system achieved a theoretical Z-axis resolution of 1 μm and a vertical travel range of 50 mm, with accuracy and repeatability comparable to research-grade bioprinters. Initial printing trials using polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels demonstrated high-fidelity microfluidic constructs with adequate dimensional precision. Collectively, these results validate the functionality of the proposed system and highlight its potential as a flexible, precise, and cost-effective platform that is also easy to customize to advance the democratization of biofabrication in TE.

Bibliographic details

Published
2025-10-17
Journal/source
Inventions
Publisher
MDPI AG
DOI
10.3390/inventions10050092
Type
journal-article
Language
en
Volume / issue
10 / 5
Pages
92
ISSN
2411-5134

Access and metrics

Open access
Yes
OA status
gold
License
cc-by
Version
publishedVersion
Cited by
0
References
27
Retracted
No

Authors and affiliations

  1. Daniel Sanchez-GarciaUniversidad de Salamanca
  2. Anuar Giménez-El-AmraniHospital General Universitario De Valencia · Fundación General
  3. Armando González MuñozUniversidad de Salamanca
  4. Andrés Sanz-GarcíaCorresponding authorUniversidad de Salamanca · Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca

Topics and keywords

3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchBiofabricationModular designMicrofluidicsSelf-healing hydrogelsDigital Light ProcessingTissue engineeringInnovator

Funding

  • Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León · SA108P24
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades y Agencia Estatal de Investigación · PID2023-149836NB, PLEC2022-009392, FPU22/03616
  • Fundación General de la Universidad de Salamanca · PC_TCUE1820P_034
  • Conselleria de Sanitat Conselleria de Sanidad · CDEI-02/20-A
  • Agencia Valenciana de la Innovación · CAICO/2023/282
Perspective and practical signals

Why it matters

Extends the table beyond extrusion: open-source light-based bioprinting hardware.

Limitations

No limitation note curated yet.