Liquid Handling · Automation · Liquid dispensing · 2020 · SLAS Technology
FINDUS: An Open-Source 3D Printable Liquid-Handling Workstation for Laboratory Automation in Life Sciences
3D-printed laboratory devices can enable ambitious research purposes even at a low-budget level. To follow this trend, here we describe the construction, calibration, and usage of the FINDUS (Fully Integrable Noncommercial Dispensing Utility System).
Performance the paper reports
3 of 5- Motion2 µmMotion accuracy: reported
- Volume1.4%Volumetric accuracy: reported
- Viability—Cell viability: not reported
- Unattended—Unattended operation: not reported
- StandardISO8655Standard compliance: reported
- Motion / positional accuracy2 µm
The stepper motor allowed a positional accuracy of synthesis batches and introduced a polypropylene frit into the piston stroke of approximately 2 µm.
- Volumetric accuracy1.4%
The permissible error limits according to For verification of the program flow, we included a simula- ISO8655 were 1.4% to 2.8% of the nominal volume.29 tion mode in offline setup.
- Reported against a written standardISO8655
Determination of the Pipetting Performance by Means of the Gravimetric Protocol, as Described in ISO8655.
How hard this is to adopt
3.1 of 5, higher is easierEach score is shown against the range the other 59 builds actually occupy, because no criterion uses the full 1–5 scale. These describe how reproducible the build is, not how good the science is.
Resolution
3/1–5Smallest calibrated volume 20 uL (P200) with ~2 µm piston positioning and systematic error under 0.68%, though stroke speed is limited to 4 mm/s.
Throughput
3/2–5Single-channel pipette unit with manual tool swap (~10 s), filling one 96-well plate in 3:30 min; the eight-channel speedup is hypothetical only.
Parts sourcing
3/2–4Mix of common parts and custom/printed components.
Skill needed
4/2–4Build/operation described as low-skill or basic assembly.
Facilities needed
2/2–4Requires specialized facilities, equipment, or consumables.
Documentation
4/2–5Open resources include several build or operation artifacts.
Validation effort
3/2–4ISO 8655 gravimetric calibration at 11 volumes with 10 replicates over three days, but ISO limits and literature values are specs rather than an experimental benchmark.
Cycle time
3/1–4No timing comparison reported; authors state speed was not a design goal and the 3:30 min plate fill is unbenchmarked against manual pipetting.
2 further criteria are recorded but not shown
- Application Level — scored 2 (75% of records share one value), so it cannot separate one build from another.
- Build Time (scored for only 6 of 60 records), so it cannot separate one build from another.
Both remain in the published dataset.
Have you built this?
Report what it took, including attempts that stalled. A failed build tells the next laboratory what the documentation leaves out.
Know what this record is missing?
The index has no which files exist (CAD, bill of materials, firmware…) for this build. If you are an author or have built it, you know; a GitHub issue pre-filled with this record takes a minute.
Record metadata
Publication data
Matched by doi · retrieved 2026-07-21
Abstract
3D-printed laboratory devices can enable ambitious research purposes even at a low-budget level. To follow this trend, here we describe the construction, calibration, and usage of the FINDUS (Fully Integrable Noncommercial Dispensing Utility System). We report the successful 3D printing and assembly of a liquid-handling workstation for less than $400. Using this setup, we achieve reliable and flexible liquid-dispensing automation with relative pipetting errors of less than 0.3%. We show our system is well suited for several showcase applications from both the biology and chemistry fields. In support of the open-source spirit, we make all 3D models, assembly instructions, and source code available for free download, rebuild, and modification.
Bibliographic details
Access and metrics
Topics and keywords
Funding
- johannes gutenberg-universität mainz
Perspective and practical signals
Why it matters
Strong open-source workstation reference with reported pipetting error metrics; useful comparator to OTTO/digital pipette.
Limitations
No limitation note curated yet.